*5:4εγω rell ¦ — Mept ℵ,NU ¦ A omits the whole verse
†5:4πολυ rell ¦ πολλα TR ¦ A omits the whole verse
‡5:4και αναγνωναι f35 Md⅕,e,g⅓,i⅓ CP,TR ¦ — Ma,b,d,e⅕,f,g⅔,h,i⅔ ℵ,RP,HF,OC,NU (The clause forces an awkward meaning upon βλεπειν αυτο, which now must really mean ‘look at it’.)
§5:9τω θεω ημας f35 Ma,d,e⅔,f,h,i⅗ ℵ,CP,RP,HF,OC,TR ¦ ~ 312 Mb,g,i⅖ ¦ 3 Me⅓ ¦ 12 A,NU [Why do you suppose NU follows a single MS, of demonstrably inferior quality in Revelation (objectively so), against virtually all others (perhaps six scattered cursives have ‘our’ for ‘us’) plus lat,syr,bo? And why do the editors of modern versions follow their lead? Why? (Hoskier says the word was ‘lost’ in the transition from one column to the next—I don’t have access to a facsimile of the codex to check it, but assuming that Hoskier is correct about the location then the omission was probably inadvertent, one of the many slips that disfigure the MS.)]
*5:14λεγοντα το f35 Ma,f,ipt CP,RP,HF ¦ ελεγεν 2 Mb ¦ ελεγον 2 Mg,i¼ ¦ ελεγον Ma¼,d,e,h ℵA,OC,NU,TR (The participle is controlled by ηκουσα; the article should be read in any case.)
και αναγνωναι f35 Md⅕,e,g⅓,i⅓ CP,TR ¦ — Ma,b,d,e⅕,f,g⅔,h,i⅔ ℵ,RP,HF,OC,NU (The clause forces an awkward meaning upon βλεπειν αυτο, which now must really mean ‘look at it’.)
ο rell ¦ 1 ων Me¼ TR ¦ — Mh⅔ ℵ
ανοιξαι f35 Md,e,g,h ℵA,CP,OC,NU,TR ¦ ο ανοιγων Ma,b,f,i RP,HF
και rell ¦ 1 λυσαι ℵ,TR
ειδον rell ¦ ιδον [22 assorted mss] ¦ 1 και ιδου Mb CP,TR ¦ ιδου και A
εστηκος rell ¦ εστηκως Mb⅖,e⅓,g¼ ℵ
εχον rell ¦ εχων Md⅕,e¼,g,h¼ 𝕻24ℵA,NU
α f35 Ma,b,d,f,g,i CP,RP,HF,OC ¦ οι Me,h ℵA,NU,TR (The gender agrees with ‘horns’, not ‘eyes’, which is unexpected.)
επτα rell [NU] ¦ — Mept A
πνευματα του θεου rell ¦ ~ 231 Mept TR
αποστελλομενα f35 Ma,b,e¼,f,i¾ CP,RP,HF,OC ¦ τα 1 Me¼,g,i⅕ ¦ τα απεσταλμενα Md¾,ept TR ¦ απεσταλμενα Mhpt 𝕻24ℵ ¦ απεσταλμενοι A,NU
ειληφεν rell ¦ 1 το βιβλιον TR ¦ add το βιβλιον at end of verse Mept
τω θεω ημας f35 Ma,d,e⅔,f,h,i⅗ ℵ,CP,RP,HF,OC,TR ¦ ~ 312 Mb,g,i⅖ ¦ 3 Me⅓ ¦ 12 A,NU [Why do you suppose NU follows a single MS, of demonstrably inferior quality in Revelation (objectively so), against virtually all others (perhaps six scattered cursives have ‘our’ for ‘us’) plus lat,syr,bo? And why do the editors of modern versions follow their lead? Why? (Hoskier says the word was ‘lost’ in the transition from one column to the next—I don’t have access to a facsimile of the codex to check it, but assuming that Hoskier is correct about the location then the omission was probably inadvertent, one of the many slips that disfigure the MS.)]
λεγοντα το f35 Ma,f,ipt CP,RP,HF ¦ ελεγεν 2 Mb ¦ ελεγον 2 Mg,i¼ ¦ ελεγον Ma¼,d,e,h ℵA,OC,NU,TR (The participle is controlled by ηκουσα; the article should be read in any case.)