*2:3αυτω f35 [91%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B,C [9%] NU (Would not James, a Jew, write ‘to him’?)
†2:3ὧδε rell ¦ ὦδε f35 [40%] (Since there appears to be no difference in meaning, I follow the usual spelling, but wish to record the variant for possible future reference; a similar statement will obtain wherever the word occurs.)
‡2:3εκει η καθου f35 ℵA (97%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU ¦ ~ 231 B (2%) ECM ¦ 1 και 3 C (0.6%) ¦ two other variants
§2:3ωδε f35 ℵ (93.2%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — A,B,C (6.8%) NU
*2:4ου f35 ℵA,C (26.8%) NU ¦ και 1 (72.2%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ και (0.6%) ¦ — B (0.4%) (The protasis occupies verses 2 and 3; the και looks to me like an infelicitous gloss introduced by copyists who lost the flow of the argument.)
†2:5του κοσμου f35 (90.7%) RP,HF,OC,CP ¦ 12 τουτου (5.6%) TR ¦ τω κοσμω ℵA,B,C (2.4%) NU ¦ εν τω κοσμω (0.4%) ¦ και τω κοσμω (0.2%) ¦ εν κοσμω (0.8%)
‡2:8σεαυτον f35 ℵA(B)C [50%] RP,HF,OC,TR,NU ¦ εαυτον [50%] CP (It would be easy to drop one of the two sigmas—ΩCCΕΑΥΤΟΝ)
§2:9προσωποληπτειτε f35 [98.5%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ προσωπολημπτειτε ℵA,B,C [1.5%] NU
*2:10τηρησει f35 [89.5%] RP,HF,TR,CP ¦ τηρηση ℵB,C [1.5%] OC,NU ¦ τελεσει [3%] ¦ πληρωσει A [5%] ¦ three other variants (Since the apodosis is indicative, the protasis is too; James isn’t being hypothetical.)
†2:10πταισει f35 [96.5%] RP,HF,TR,CP ¦ πταιση ℵA,B,C [3%] OC,NU ¦ two other variants
‡2:11μη μοιχευσης … μη φονευσης f35 A,B [74%] OC,TR,CP,NU ¦ μη μοιχευσεις … μη φονευσεις [7%] RP,HF [ECM says that ℵ [3%] are ambiguous as to these first two variants—in uncial script they are very similar] ¦ μη μοιχευσης … ου φονευσεις [1%] ¦ μη μοιχευσεις … ου φονευσεις [5%] ¦ μη φονευσης … μη μοιχευσης C [4%] ¦ μη φονευσης … ου μοιχευσεις [3%] ¦ μη φονευσεις … μη μοιχευσεις [0.5%] ¦ μη φονευσης … ου μοιχευσης [1.5%] (There are two other variants plus another ambiguity that account for [1%].)
*2:13ανηλεος f35 [20%] ¦ ανελεος ℵA,B,C [30%] RP,HF,OC,NU ¦ ανιλεως [50%] CP,TR (That someone would have introduced an Attic form in the middle ages is scarcely credible, so f35 is early.)
†2:13κατακαυχαται f35 ℵB,C [85%] RP,HF,OC,CP,NU ¦ 1 δε [10%] ¦ και 1 [3%] TR ¦ κατακαυχασθω [1%] ¦ κατακαυχασθω δε A [1%] ¦ two other variants
‡2:13ελεον f35 C [80%] RP,HF,CP ¦ ελεος ℵA,B [20%] OC,TR,NU (I take ‘the law of liberty’ to be the subject of the verb, κατακαυχαται, and ‘mercy’ its direct object—“That law exalts mercy over judgment”. But that subject is in a prior sentence, and one has to stop and think.)
§2:14λεγη τις f35 ℵB [70%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU ¦ ~ 21 A,C [1%] ¦ λεγει 2 [28%] ¦ three other variants
*2:14εχει f35 [46%] ¦ εχη ℵA,B,C [47%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU ¦ εχειν [4.5%] ¦ σχη [2.5%] (James is stating a fact; the person doesn’t have works.)
†2:15δε f35 A,C [84%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵB [15%] NU ¦ two other variants
‡2:15ωσιν f35 A [95%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵB,C [5%] NU
§2:17εργα εχη f35 [75%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ~ 21 ℵA,B,C [24%] NU ¦ three other variants
*2:18εκ f35 (88.2%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ χωρις ℵA,B,C (10.8%) NU ¦ two other variants (This delightful verse is generally misunderstood to this day. [At least three of the four Alexandrian variants in this verse derive from misunderstanding.] The translations that close the quote after the first ‘works’ don’t make sense. The hypothetical objector has disclaimed faith, so for James to say, “Show me your faith,” doesn’t follow. James clearly teaches salvation by faith, a faith that is alive [if you’re alive you do things]. But an orthodox Jew believes in salvation by works, so here James [who had once been one] anticipates an objection from that quarter. The salvation-by-works person has a different faith.)
†2:18σου f35 C [92%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B [8%] NU
§2:18μου f35 A [93%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵB,C [7%] NU ¦ one other variant
*2:19ο θεος εις εστιν f35 (80.4%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ 234 (9.9%) ¦ ~ 324 B (4.2%) ¦ ~ 3124 C (1.6%) ¦ ~ 3412 ℵA (1.8%) NU ¦ ~ 342 (0.8%) ¦ 124 (0.6%) ¦ 24 (0.6%) ¦ ~ 42 (0.2%) (In his retort James cites a central tenet in Judaism. Since the demons believe the same thing, and it doesn’t do them any good, something more or different is needed.)
‡2:21ἁβρααμ f35 [50%] ¦ ἀβρααμ ℵA,B,C [50%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU (This statement of evidence obtains in verse 23 as well.) [When Jehovah changed Abram’s name to Abraham (Genesis 17:5) the intervocalic aspiration in Hebrew is adequately represented in English by ‘h’; but so far as I know, there is no way in Greek to indicate intervocalic aspiration within a word—the only alternative to losing the aspiration altogether would be to place it at the beginning of the word.]
αυτω f35 [91%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B,C [9%] NU (Would not James, a Jew, write ‘to him’?)
ὧδε rell ¦ ὦδε f35 [40%] (Since there appears to be no difference in meaning, I follow the usual spelling, but wish to record the variant for possible future reference; a similar statement will obtain wherever the word occurs.)
εκει η καθου f35 ℵA (97%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU ¦ ~ 231 B (2%) ECM ¦ 1 και 3 C (0.6%) ¦ two other variants
ωδε f35 ℵ (93.2%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — A,B,C (6.8%) NU
ου f35 ℵA,C (26.8%) NU ¦ και 1 (72.2%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ και (0.6%) ¦ — B (0.4%) (The protasis occupies verses 2 and 3; the και looks to me like an infelicitous gloss introduced by copyists who lost the flow of the argument.)
του κοσμου f35 (90.7%) RP,HF,OC,CP ¦ 12 τουτου (5.6%) TR ¦ τω κοσμω ℵA,B,C (2.4%) NU ¦ εν τω κοσμω (0.4%) ¦ και τω κοσμω (0.2%) ¦ εν κοσμω (0.8%)
σεαυτον f35 ℵA(B)C [50%] RP,HF,OC,TR,NU ¦ εαυτον [50%] CP (It would be easy to drop one of the two sigmas—ΩCCΕΑΥΤΟΝ)
προσωποληπτειτε f35 [98.5%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ προσωπολημπτειτε ℵA,B,C [1.5%] NU
τηρησει f35 [89.5%] RP,HF,TR,CP ¦ τηρηση ℵB,C [1.5%] OC,NU ¦ τελεσει [3%] ¦ πληρωσει A [5%] ¦ three other variants (Since the apodosis is indicative, the protasis is too; James isn’t being hypothetical.)
πταισει f35 [96.5%] RP,HF,TR,CP ¦ πταιση ℵA,B,C [3%] OC,NU ¦ two other variants
μη μοιχευσης … μη φονευσης f35 A,B [74%] OC,TR,CP,NU ¦ μη μοιχευσεις … μη φονευσεις [7%] RP,HF [ECM says that ℵ [3%] are ambiguous as to these first two variants—in uncial script they are very similar] ¦ μη μοιχευσης … ου φονευσεις [1%] ¦ μη μοιχευσεις … ου φονευσεις [5%] ¦ μη φονευσης … μη μοιχευσης C [4%] ¦ μη φονευσης … ου μοιχευσεις [3%] ¦ μη φονευσεις … μη μοιχευσεις [0.5%] ¦ μη φονευσης … ου μοιχευσης [1.5%] (There are two other variants plus another ambiguity that account for [1%].)
ανηλεος f35 [20%] ¦ ανελεος ℵA,B,C [30%] RP,HF,OC,NU ¦ ανιλεως [50%] CP,TR (That someone would have introduced an Attic form in the middle ages is scarcely credible, so f35 is early.)
κατακαυχαται f35 ℵB,C [85%] RP,HF,OC,CP,NU ¦ 1 δε [10%] ¦ και 1 [3%] TR ¦ κατακαυχασθω [1%] ¦ κατακαυχασθω δε A [1%] ¦ two other variants
ελεον f35 C [80%] RP,HF,CP ¦ ελεος ℵA,B [20%] OC,TR,NU (I take ‘the law of liberty’ to be the subject of the verb, κατακαυχαται, and ‘mercy’ its direct object—“That law exalts mercy over judgment”. But that subject is in a prior sentence, and one has to stop and think.)
λεγη τις f35 ℵB [70%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU ¦ ~ 21 A,C [1%] ¦ λεγει 2 [28%] ¦ three other variants
εχει f35 [46%] ¦ εχη ℵA,B,C [47%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU ¦ εχειν [4.5%] ¦ σχη [2.5%] (James is stating a fact; the person doesn’t have works.)
δε f35 A,C [84%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵB [15%] NU ¦ two other variants
ωσιν f35 A [95%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵB,C [5%] NU
εργα εχη f35 [75%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ ~ 21 ℵA,B,C [24%] NU ¦ three other variants
εκ f35 (88.2%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ χωρις ℵA,B,C (10.8%) NU ¦ two other variants (This delightful verse is generally misunderstood to this day. [At least three of the four Alexandrian variants in this verse derive from misunderstanding.] The translations that close the quote after the first ‘works’ don’t make sense. The hypothetical objector has disclaimed faith, so for James to say, “Show me your faith,” doesn’t follow. James clearly teaches salvation by faith, a faith that is alive [if you’re alive you do things]. But an orthodox Jew believes in salvation by works, so here James [who had once been one] anticipates an objection from that quarter. The salvation-by-works person has a different faith.)
μου f35 A [93%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵB,C [7%] NU ¦ one other variant
ο θεος εις εστιν f35 (80.4%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ 234 (9.9%) ¦ ~ 324 B (4.2%) ¦ ~ 3124 C (1.6%) ¦ ~ 3412 ℵA (1.8%) NU ¦ ~ 342 (0.8%) ¦ 124 (0.6%) ¦ 24 (0.6%) ¦ ~ 42 (0.2%) (In his retort James cites a central tenet in Judaism. Since the demons believe the same thing, and it doesn’t do them any good, something more or different is needed.)
ἁβρααμ f35 [50%] ¦ ἀβρααμ ℵA,B,C [50%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU (This statement of evidence obtains in verse 23 as well.) [When Jehovah changed Abram’s name to Abraham (Genesis 17:5) the intervocalic aspiration in Hebrew is adequately represented in English by ‘h’; but so far as I know, there is no way in Greek to indicate intervocalic aspiration within a word—the only alternative to losing the aspiration altogether would be to place it at the beginning of the word.]