†3:2δυναμενος f35 ℵ [23%] ¦ δυνατος A,B [76.5%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU (two other variants, and ECM lists codex C as ambiguous.) (Is it not more likely that the present participle [unexpected] would be changed to the adjective than vice versa?—but it makes great sense, ‘being able to bridle’.)
‡3:3ιδε f35 [60%] RP,HF,OC,CP ¦ ει δε [38.5%] NU ¦ ιδου [0.5%] TR (ECM lists six uncials as ambiguous, including ℵA,B,C. The variant chosen by NU scarcely makes sense. The και at the beginning of verse 4 presupposes an imperative at the beginning of verse 3.)
§3:3προς το f35 A (97%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ εις 2 ℵB,C (2.4%) NU ¦ τω (0.6%)
*3:4ανεμων σκληρων f35 ℵB,C [44%] NU ¦ ~ 21 A [56%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP
†3:4αν f35 A,C [99.5%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵB [0.5%] NU
‡3:4ιθυνοντος f35 [21%] ¦ ευθυνοντος ℵA,B,C [79%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU (At issue is a mere question of spelling, the first variant being classical Greek. It seems to me more probable that the unfamiliar classical form would be changed to the familiar koine than vice versa [most lexicons don’t even list the classical form].)
§3:11γλυκυ και το πικρον f35 ℵA,B,C [85%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU ¦ 124 [4%] ¦ 1234 υδωρ [3%] ¦ ~ 4231 [8%]
*3:12ουτως f35 ℵ [97%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — A,B,C [3%] NU
†3:12ουδεμια πηγη αλυκον και f35 [96%] RP,HF,OC,TR(CP) ¦ ουδε αλυκον ℵ [1.6%] ¦ ουτε αλυκον A,B,C [1.8%] NU ¦ three other variants (Who knows what got into the Alexandrians here.)
*3:15αυτη η σοφια f35 ℵA,B [84%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU ¦ ~ 231 C [10%] ¦ 23 [6%]
†3:15αλλ f35 𝕻100A,C [99.4%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ αλλα ℵB [0.6%] NU
‡3:17και f35 𝕻100 [90%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B,C [10%] NU
§3:18δε f35 A,B,C [56.6%] NU ¦ δε της [42%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ δε ο ℵ [0.4%] ¦ — [1%] (The article is inappropriate here. Who knows what motivated whoever added it, but it is a mistake.)
δυναμενος f35 ℵ [23%] ¦ δυνατος A,B [76.5%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU (two other variants, and ECM lists codex C as ambiguous.) (Is it not more likely that the present participle [unexpected] would be changed to the adjective than vice versa?—but it makes great sense, ‘being able to bridle’.)
ιδε f35 [60%] RP,HF,OC,CP ¦ ει δε [38.5%] NU ¦ ιδου [0.5%] TR (ECM lists six uncials as ambiguous, including ℵA,B,C. The variant chosen by NU scarcely makes sense. The και at the beginning of verse 4 presupposes an imperative at the beginning of verse 3.)
προς το f35 A (97%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ εις 2 ℵB,C (2.4%) NU ¦ τω (0.6%)
ανεμων σκληρων f35 ℵB,C [44%] NU ¦ ~ 21 A [56%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP
αν f35 A,C [99.5%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵB [0.5%] NU
ιθυνοντος f35 [21%] ¦ ευθυνοντος ℵA,B,C [79%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU (At issue is a mere question of spelling, the first variant being classical Greek. It seems to me more probable that the unfamiliar classical form would be changed to the familiar koine than vice versa [most lexicons don’t even list the classical form].)
γλυκυ και το πικρον f35 ℵA,B,C [85%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU ¦ 124 [4%] ¦ 1234 υδωρ [3%] ¦ ~ 4231 [8%]
ουτως f35 ℵ [97%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — A,B,C [3%] NU
ουδεμια πηγη αλυκον και f35 [96%] RP,HF,OC,TR(CP) ¦ ουδε αλυκον ℵ [1.6%] ¦ ουτε αλυκον A,B,C [1.8%] NU ¦ three other variants (Who knows what got into the Alexandrians here.)
αυτη η σοφια f35 ℵA,B [84%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP,NU ¦ ~ 231 C [10%] ¦ 23 [6%]
αλλ f35 𝕻100A,C [99.4%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ αλλα ℵB [0.6%] NU
και f35 𝕻100 [90%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — ℵA,B,C [10%] NU
δε f35 A,B,C [56.6%] NU ¦ δε της [42%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ δε ο ℵ [0.4%] ¦ — [1%] (The article is inappropriate here. Who knows what motivated whoever added it, but it is a mistake.)