†2:5οικουρους f35 [97%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ οικουργους ℵA,C,I [3%] NU (Who knows where the Alexandrians got their spelling, but the mystery doesn’t make it correct.)
§2:7αδιαφθοριαν f35 (83.2%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ αδιαφοριαν (8%) ¦ αφθοριαν ℵA(C) (6.9%) NU ¦ αφθονιαν 𝕻32 (1.4%) ¦ two other readings (0.5%) (Both the longer stem and the double consonant have over 90% attestation, but with different alignments. φθ→φ would presumably be an easier alteration than the reverse. Might the Alexandrian reading be a case of homoioarcton?)
*2:7αφθαρσιαν f35 (82.8%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — 𝕻32vℵA,C (17.2%) NU (The idea of ‘immortality’ didn’t seem to fit, so the Alexandrians omitted it.)
†2:8ημων f35 ℵC [80%] RP,HF,OC,CP,NU ¦ υμων A [20%] TR
οικουρους f35 [97%] RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ οικουργους ℵA,C,I [3%] NU (Who knows where the Alexandrians got their spelling, but the mystery doesn’t make it correct.)
βλασφημηται rell ¦ βλασφημειται [5%] CP
αδιαφθοριαν f35 (83.2%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ αδιαφοριαν (8%) ¦ αφθοριαν ℵA(C) (6.9%) NU ¦ αφθονιαν 𝕻32 (1.4%) ¦ two other readings (0.5%) (Both the longer stem and the double consonant have over 90% attestation, but with different alignments. φθ→φ would presumably be an easier alteration than the reverse. Might the Alexandrian reading be a case of homoioarcton?)
αφθαρσιαν f35 (82.8%) RP,HF,OC,TR,CP ¦ — 𝕻32vℵA,C (17.2%) NU (The idea of ‘immortality’ didn’t seem to fit, so the Alexandrians omitted it.)
ημων f35 ℵC [80%] RP,HF,OC,CP,NU ¦ υμων A [20%] TR